 |
|
Journal
of Financial Planning - September 1999
"Even
reputable financial service providers keep trying to turn tax-deductible
life insurance premiums into tax-free retirement benefits."
New Versions of Old Tricks: Springing Cash Values
by Peter Katt, CFP, LIC
The
perfect retirement plan for high income earners has tax-deductible contributions
and tax-free benefits. Financial product marketers devote great energy
and effort to designing retirement plans that feature such claimed tax
nirvana, reaping the commission rewards of selling them. These marketers
are greatly aided in their efforts to design and sell such schemes because
the tax code is overwhelmingly complicated. They take the position that
if something isn't explicitly prohibited in the tax code, it must be okay.
This results in marketers staying one step ahead of the Internal Revenue
Service by creating new versions of old tricks when existing ones have
been exposed by the IRS. Also, consumers of such products, tired of carrying
such a heavy income tax burden, are easy prey because of the promised
tax benefits.
Unfortunately, in the real world, tax-deductible contributions and tax-free
benefits don't exist without resorting to deception or fraud. During the
past year, I have encountered two variations of the same theme promising
consumers these extraordinary tax benefits via the purchase of life insurance.
Both involve a concept known as springing cash values. This concept features
payments of very large premiums while a policy is subject to favorable
tax treatment, then transferring the policy to the insured when the policy
appears to have no taxable values, after which the cash values spring
to life. Two recent cases will explain springing cash value.
Continuous Group Insurance
Group term insurance premiums paid by an employer are tax deductible,
but the insured must report as income the value of term coverage in excess
of $50,000. The value of excess coverage is determined by referring to
a uniform premium charge published by the IRS. For example, a physician
corporation providing a self-employed 38-year-old male with group term
insurance of $2,775,000 would pay a deductible annual group term premium
of about $3,000, with the employee reporting as income the uniform premium
charge of $3,600.
These facts are from a case I reviewed last year, except, the annual group
premium was $30,000, not $3,000. My client was told that his corporation
could deduct the entire $30,000 as a group term premium. This plan, referred
to as continuous group insurance, was marketed as a "nonqualified pension
plan." Even though the continuous group premiums were ten times higher
than a typical group term premium, the policy didn't generate any cash
values.
However, after five years the continuous group policy, having no cash
values, would be converted to a permanent policy, owned by the insured,
with coverage reduced to $275,000 and premiums of $43,235 for two years,
then none. This conversion policy had a guaranteed account value after
the first year of $178,000, and after allowing for surrender charges,
a guaranteed surrender value of $330,000 and a projected surrender value
of $512,000 in the 11th year, representing a guaranteed rate-of-return
of 14 percent and a projected ROR of 18 percent!
Obviously this continuous group plan doesn't have two policies at all-only
one. The cash values in the so-called conversion policy are generated
by the continuous group premiums paid during the first five years. That
is, most of the funding for this nonqualified pension plan occurs during
the first five years, when the overpaid continuous group premiums are
tax deductible and the insured reports as income only a fraction of the
actual premium. Then the conversion to a personal permanent policy occurs
at a time when the true value is being hidden from the IRS, so the insured
reports no taxable income upon conversion.
Clever, except that this isn't group term-it is transparently group permanent
insurance because the economic benefits extend beyond one policy year.
If a group insurance policy provides permanent benefits, the cost of the
permanent benefits is included in the employed insured's income in that
year.
The good news for this client is that the IRS never discovered this fraud.
The bad news is that the insurance company he bought this continuous group
plan from was seized by regulators due to solvency concerns two years
after it began, and since he had no right to any cash values until the
conversion, he lost $54,000, the difference between the cost of true group
term and the continuous group premiums.
VEBA: Pre-Paid Retiree Plan
Another self-employed physician client purchased
a similar springing cash values plan that the marketers referred to as
a "pre-paid retiree plan," but his plan was wrapped in a VEBA (Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association). Large tax-deductible contributions were
made to the VEBA, purporting to be a death-benefit-only plan. After a
deduction for VEBA administration, all of the annual tax-deductible contributions
were used to purchase life insurance, having no value for five years.
Then, when the insured converted the VEBA policy to a personal policy,
its values magically began appearing. The premiums for this apparent term
insurance were about ten times higher than term costs, with the insured
only reporting the economic benefit of term insurance (PS 58 rates or
the insurance company's term rate). This is the same scam as continuous
group insurance. As was the case with the continuous group plan, most
of the funding for this "pre-paid retiree plan" occurs during the first
five years when the overpaid term premiums within the VEBA are tax deductible,
with the insured picking up as income only a fraction of the actual premium.
Then the conversion to a personal permanent policy occurs at a time when
the true value is being hidden from the IRS, so the insured reports no
taxable income upon conversion.
This second client also lost all of his premiums for the first two years
because he was with the same insurance company that was seized, but he
continued his VEBA plan with two other companies. The IRS noticed what
was going on and hit him with tax deficiencies, interest and penalties
for several of the years he took the VEBA deductions. Rather than continuing
to fight with the IRS in Tax Court, this client decided to settle up;
in exchange, the IRS dropped penalty charges. As this is being written,
at least one major springing cash value case is in Tax Court. The plaintiffs
are trying to focus the arguments on arcane VEBA rules, but this is nonsense
since it completely obscures what the real fraud is. The IRS, I think,
has figured out that the VEBA is nothing more than a wrapping for the
springing cash value scam. I am betting on the IRS.
Not only does the "nonqualified pension plan" carry the risk the IRS will
swoop down and recover back taxes, interest and penalties, but because
there is such a long time (usually 12 to 14 years) between the payment
of very large premiums and having access to the accumulated value, clients
run the risk that the insurance company will fold (already happened once),
clients will need access to their funds, or their financial situation
will have changed such that they aren't able to keep up the very large
group premiums, causing the policy to lapse with the loss of all the premiums
previously paid.
You may think that these springing cash value plans are being marketed
out on the fringe of legitimacy. They are not. The continuous group plan
was sold by a pension administration firm who had built up a lot of goodwill
over some 20 years, installing and administering qualified pension and
profit-sharing plans. The VEBA plan was endorsed by the state medical
society, and the financial planning firm selling it was an authorized
representative of the medical society. Indeed, the client who bought the
VEBA was referred to the financial planning firm by his state medical
society. No matter how professional and sincere marketers may appear,
there are no plans or products that can legitimately provide tax-deductible
life insurance premiums with tax-free retirement benefits.
Reprinted with permission by the Financial Planning
Association, Journal of Financial Planning, Volume 12, Issue 8, September
1999.
Peter
Katt, CFP, LIC, sole proprietor of Katt & Co., is a fee-only life
insurance adviser located in Kalamazoo, Michigan (269.372.3497).
|
|
|
 |